Talk:La Tristesse Durera (Scream to a Sigh)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.loudersound.com/features/the-manic-street-preachers-their-best-songs-in-their-own-words

References?

I noticed that there are no sources listed on this article - so I added the references tag. I'm particularly curious as to the comment about the Manics releasing Patrick Bateman as a single - in Manic Street Preachers: Sweet Venom by Martin Clarke (published in 1997, ISBN 0589652599 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum) the author says "The lyrics were inspired, but the musical accompaniment was turgid, trudging soft metal, and James was quick to acknowledge this." I can't say if this is directly contradictory to the other comment, as it's a different band member, but it still needs clearing up. Desdinova 23:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:La Tristesse Durera.jpg

Image:La Tristesse Durera.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prod

I have removed the prod on this article because the guideline re: notability of individual songs is a general one and does not apply in everycase. The discography of one of the most significant modern bands is absolutely notable. For a start, a google search of the specific term "la tristesse durera (scream to a sigh)" returns 15,300 results reflecting the popularity of the band and this single in particular. The sources range from a vast number (due to tthe song's popularity) of hosts of the mp3, video, and lyrics of the song, to reliable sources indicating notability (e.g. listed in the guardian's 1000 songs everyone must hear http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/table/2009/mar/19/life-death-1000-songs-everyone-must-hear ) The song reached number 22 in the charts, was popular in the UK and Japan, per WP:notability subjects only need to prove notable once in their history to be valid. The article needs it's references improved for sure but the prod was not applicable in this case. Polyamorph (talk) 22:01, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This single has received significant coverage from a number of reliable third party sources and is certainly notable enough for a Wikipedia article. There's no way that this should've been marked for deletion. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 14:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]